Matthew 16:13-17:13
As we pick back up in
Matthew 16, Jesus ministry is beginning to wind down. Most Bible historians and those who study the
time line of the Bible believe that the point we are at in Matthew’s gospel
would have been only about 6 months prior to Jesus’s death. He has been teaching and training the
disciples, but He is about to give them one more exam. This exam would show them that they still do
not really have it all figured out yet.
They do not yet have the whole story down.
Jesus leaves the area he
was in last week – Mark tells us He was in Bethsaida (Mark 8:22) – with the
crowds and the Pharisees and the Sadducees.
He has spent a significant portion of time in this area doing all kinds
of signs and wonders testifying to whom He is, but He takes His disciples up
north to get away from the crowds one last time. They go to a place called Caesarea Philippi
which is about 25 miles straight north of Bethsaida. Caesarea Philippi had a diverse history, and
was an area that many religions held sacred.
The Jews even held it in high regard because the head waters of the Jordan
River are in the hills around the city.
As they walked there,
according to Mark, Jesus asked the first question of the exam. This one did not really count for any kind of
credit. It was a pretty simple
question.
Now when Jesus came
into the district of Caesarea Philippi, He was asking His disciples, "Who
do people say that the Son of Man is?" And they said, "Some say John
the Baptist; and others, Elijah; but still others, Jeremiah, or one of the
prophets." – Matthew 16:13-14
The disciples start naming
off people they’ve heard others say Jesus was.
They started with John the Baptist, the forerunner of the Messiah. But John was killed back in Matthew 14, so
why would the Jews think Jesus was John the Baptist? Herod, who had ordered John killed, had
started a rumor that this miracle working from Nazareth was really a
resurrected John. I have no idea why
Herod had started this rumor, but if you study the Herod family at all you will
see that this kind of foolishness was rampant amongst them.
Others said He was
Elijah. Why Elijah? Malachi 3 refers to a messenger who will
clear the way before the Lord. Just a
few paragraphs later in Malachi 4 we read:
"Remember the law
of Moses My servant, even the statutes and ordinances which I commanded him in
Horeb for all Israel. "Behold, I am going to send you Elijah the prophet
before the coming of the great and terrible day of the LORD. "He will
restore the hearts of the fathers to their children and the hearts of the
children to their fathers, so that I will not come and smite the land with a
curse." – Malachi 4:4-6
So the Jews think that
Elijah must return before Messiah comes.
Jews today still leave an open seat and an open door at Passover in case
Elijah was to return and randomly come to their house for Passover. Out of all of the options listed, I think
this one has the best chance. According
to 2 Kings 2, Elijah did not die. He was
taken to heaven in a chariot of fire, so it would seem that God has a special
plan for him.
But there were other
people who thought Jesus was Jeremiah.
This one is weird. There was a
semi-popular belief that once God revealed to Jeremiah what would happen during
the Babylonian invasion that Jeremiah went into the temple and stole the altar
of incense and the Ark of the Covenant and hid them from the Babylonians. I am not quite sure how Jeremiah would have
taken the Ark of the Covenant by himself and hidden it. Since he was not the High Priest and it was
not the Day of Atonement, no one was allowed into the Holy of Holies. Touching
the Ark outright was certain death, just read 2 Samuel 6. But regardless, some held to this idea and
said that Jeremiah would come back to return the altar of incense and the Ark
to the temple before Messiah would return.
Others yet said He was
just a prophet. They all acknowledged
that He was no ordinary man, but they all fell short of realizing who He truly
is.
So then Jesus asks the
second question of the exam. This one is
for all the marbles and was a pass / fail question. In fact, this question still rings down the
corridors of time and it is a question that every person will have to answer at
some point in their life. Failing this
exam leads to eternal punishment.
Passing leads to eternal joy.
He said to them,
"But who do you say that I am?" – Matthew 16:15
“Who do you say that I am?”
Stop cheating. Do not let your parents
answer this question for you. Do not let
your church answer this question for you.
Do not let your pastor answer this question for you. Answer it yourself. Peter, ever the spokesman, answered for the
disciples.
Simon Peter answered,
"You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." – Matthew 16:16
Christ, the Messiah, the
Anointed One, the Chosen One. The Son,
or the essence, of the living God.
Peter’s statement has rung down through the centuries as one containing
so much truth in such a short statement.
We read this and think Peter has nailed it on the head. He has just declared Jesus to be
Messiah. Peter has finally figured it
out and can go shout it from the roof tops.
But how did Peter figure this out?
Was it all the miracles? Was it
his authoritative teaching? Was it the
parables? No. Jesus explains how Peter figured this out.
And Jesus said to him,
"Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal
this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. – Matthew 16:17
Peter did not figure this
stuff out on his own. It was revealed to
him by God the Father. It is not
recorded for us that Jesus ever explicitly stated His identity. His messianic claims had alluded to Old
Testament prophecy and His signs and wonders had backed up these claims, but He
had never explicitly stated that He was Messiah. To grasp this the way that Peter had, and to
put it so succinctly, is evidence of a heart divinely regenerated by
faith.
But Jesus did not just
stop with a blessing for Peter. He went
on to expound more on Peter’s statement and draw out the implications of Him
being Messiah.
"I also say to you
that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of
Hades will not overpower it. – Matthew 16:18
We’ve all heard the
arguments that stem from this passage.
Some argue that this means Peter was the first Pope. Others argue from the Greek wording that
Peter was merely a pebble in the mortar that was used to build the church upon
the foundation of Christ, the chief cornerstone.
Normally, I’d pick apart
the false claim, but I see no need to do it here. I think we all know both arguments well enough
already. However, while the line of argumentation
from the Greek is a strong and, I believe, accurate argument, I came across
another argument that I had never heard before.
If Peter was truly the first Pope, then the rest of the apostles totally
missed that memo. The leader of the
church in Jerusalem was James, the half-brother of Jesus, not Peter. Peter was a pillar within the first church,
as were all the other apostles. Paul
rebuked Peter at one point – not something you do to the Pope. Peter himself in the second chapter of his
first epistle references this same statement from Christ. He says the church is made up of living stones
(1 Peter 2:5) while Jesus Christ is the chief corner stone (1 Peter
2:6-7). At the Jerusalem Council in Acts
15, while Peter is only one of two people to speak, it would appear that James
was the final authority as he closed the arguments and called for a letter to
be written to the Gentiles. As you read
the book of Acts, I’d say that it is pretty obvious that if Peter was the first
Pope, he sure did not act like it.
Back to our passage, Jesus
will build His church on the bedrock truth that He is the Messiah, the Son of
the living God. God’s purpose has always
been to gather a people that are His own.
This is the first time in the New Testament that this word is used, but
it doesn’t seem to confuse His listeners.
The Greek work translated “church” is the same word the Septuagint uses
when it refers to the “assembly of Israel.”
A church is a gathering, a congregation, an assembly of people. The understood that Jesus intention was to
call a people to Himself who acknowledged and proclaimed that He was the
Messiah.
Then Jesus gives another
statement that has confused people for years.
It sounds like He gave Peter some great authority.
"I will give you
the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have
been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in
heaven." – Matthew 16:19
But if we look at it
within the context, I think we’ll find that it is pretty simple for now. We will come to this again in Matthew 18, and
we get some more clarification on the topic.
However, since Matthew 18 isn’t very far away, I do not want to steal
someone’s thunder. But for now, at the
risk of over simplifying this, at its most basic level the keys Jesus is
referring to are the Gospel. Without the
Gospel, a man is bound in His sin and therefore cannot be free to enjoy
heaven. Whereas a person who has been
freed from the bondage of sin is free to enjoy heaven.
So after praising Peter
for his theologically sound, bedrock statement, Jesus gives a command that we
have seen before.
Then He warned the
disciples that they should tell no one that He was the Christ. – Matthew 16:20
Did Jesus say this because
He was afraid the crowds would try to force Him into a governmental
position? Was He afraid of the religious
rulers who would want to kill him? No. He already knew that the Sadducees and the
Pharisees wanted to kill him. Back in
Chapter 12 they were seeking a way to destroy Him. Let’s look at the next section and then come
back to verse 20. I think this will shed
light on every occasion that Jesus gave this command.
From that time Jesus
began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many
things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be
raised up on the third day. Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him,
saying, "God forbid it, Lord! This shall never happen to You." But He
turned and said to Peter, "Get behind Me, Satan! You are a stumbling block
to Me; for you are not setting your mind on God's interests, but man's." –
Matthew 16:21-23
The Greek word translated
“began” gives the idea that this dominated His teaching. The common theory within Judaism is still
that Messiah will come and restore the kingdom to Israel. He will rule like King David and over throw
all the enemies of Israel. The disciples
thought this too. Even though they
accepted the person of Jesus Christ and knew his true identity, they had not
yet come to grips with His plan. He had
been hinting at it all along. Looking
back, we see it clearly. The gospel
writers even drop us hints along the way to help us understand, such as when
Jesus referred to rebuilding the temple in 3 days. Matthew told us then that He was referring to
His resurrection. But this was the first
time for all of the disciples. Did you
get every school subject the first time the teacher covered the material? No, you learned through experience with that
subject. The same happened for Peter,
James, John, Matthew, and the others.
As Jesus tells of His
coming suffering at the hands of the chief priests and scribes, all the
disciples hear is Messiah is going to die.
But wait!! Messiah is supposed to set up His kingdom. The great and terrible day of the Lord from
Malachi 4 is supposed to be when Messiah takes over Israel and pronounces
judgement on all her enemies. They get
hung up on His death, and I am not even sure they heard the part about His
resurrection. In fact, it was not until
after He had risen from the dead that it all made sense to them (see John
2:21-22).
Peter, after this mountain
top experience and the great news that Jesus is the Messiah gets some devastating
news. It just rocks his whole
understanding of Messiah. And if you
ever need an example of Jesus’ humanity, here’s one. Peter treated Him like another man, not like
God. So he takes Jesus aside – he pulls
Messiah aside – and begins to tell Jesus that He is wrong. The Greek word for “rebuke” is the word we
get epitome from. We hardly ever use these definitions, but
Miriam-Webster’s second and third definitions are respectively “2a: a summary
of a written work; b: a brief presentation or statement of something. 3: brief
or miniature form.” The Greek literally
has the idea “to cut something up and make it smaller.” It was a very sharp, stern rebuke or
warning. Peter cut Jesus off and tried
to correct Him.
At this, Jesus drops the
hammer on poor Peter. “Get behind me,
Satan!” Mark tells us that Jesus turned
around and saw the other disciples and then rebuked Peter. The same Greek word was used here as for when
Peter rebuked Jesus.
Was not Jesus being overly
harsh with Peter by calling Him Satan? I
am going to go out on a limb and say no.
For one, He’s God and cannot sin like that. For two, He had heard this voice before back
in chapter 4. I will give you all the
kingdoms of the world if you will bow down to me. We know now that God’s plan all along was for
Jesus to die in order to redeem the world.
To go straight to ruling would have been an act of pride and
self-exaltation.
But Jesus also rebuked
Peter, and I dare say the other disciples too, for not thinking about things
God’s way. Remember, Mark said Jesus did
not rebuke Peter until He saw the other disciples. I think they all felt the same way Peter did;
Peter was just the outspoken one of the bunch.
They were more concerned about their ideas than God’s. Oh, how often we do the same?!? How many times does something happen and
instead of asking God His take on it, we try to force our own viewpoint on
it.
Why did Jesus warn the
disciples not to tell people that He was the Messiah? Because they did not yet understand the full
story. Once He died and rose again, they
would understand the purpose of His coming.
He came the first time as Redeemer, and will come later as King. Once they grasped that, He told them to go
tell the entire world about Him. But
then Jesus says something that on the surface seems disconnected from what He
just told them. Matthew 16:24-27:
Then Jesus said to His
disciples, "If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and
take up his cross and follow Me. "For whoever wishes to save his life will
lose it; but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it. "For what
will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what
will a man give in exchange for his soul? "For the Son of Man is going to
come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man
according to his deeds. – Matthew 16:24-27
So what is the cross we
are to take up if we are going to follow Jesus?
It isn’t your job, your kids, your wife, you in-laws, or your finances. The disciples knew exactly what a cross
was. It is estimated that over 8,000
Jews were crucified during the Roman occupation for true and perceived crimes
against Rome. For Jesus to tell His followers
that they needed to take up their cross and follow Him, they understood that
the word “cross” was a death sentence to something. Jesus explains in verse 25 that “whoever
wishes to save his life will lose it; but whoever loses his life for My sake
will find it.” To follow Jesus, we must
die to self. Die to our own ambitions
and to our own selfish desires.
It is this very passage
that causes me to question the notions of self-esteem and self-worth that many Christians
are pushing today. My worth is only
found in Christ. Everything I have that
amounts to anything is only because of Him.
Instead, Jesus calls me to deny myself and take up my cross. I am to deny myself of my selfish desires, to
die to my own will, and to submit to Him.
Then, and only then, will I find true meaning in life. If I gain the entire world; if I become the
wealthiest man alive; but lose my soul, what good has that done? Instead, I should be seeking first the kingdom
of God and His righteousness and storing up crowns of glory there. Oh, and by the way, I do not get to keep
those crowns. I will lay them right back
at my Savior’s feet as an act of worship.
Verse 28 has caused much
confusion amongst Bible scholars over the years. After telling the disciples that in order to
follow Him, they must die to themselves, He makes an odd statement.
"Truly I say to
you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death
until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom." – Matthew 16:28
At first glance, this does
not seem right. All 12 of these men are
long dead, and yet Christ has not returned in His kingdom. We know Scripture is not wrong, so what can
it possible mean? Is He referring to His
invisible kingdom of those who believe He is the Messiah? Or maybe He means something else. Most scholars say something else. Many believe that the answer to this prophecy
was about a week away from being revealed, and we will see what they mean in
Matthew 17. There are parallel passages
of this in Mark 9 and Luke 9, so feel free to read those on your own this
week.
Six days later Jesus
took with Him Peter and James and John his brother, and led them up on a high
mountain by themselves. And He was transfigured before them; and His face shone
like the sun, and His garments became as white as light. And behold, Moses and
Elijah appeared to them, talking with Him. Peter said to Jesus, "Lord, it
is good for us to be here; if You wish, I will make three tabernacles here, one
for You, and one for Moses, and one for Elijah." While he was still
speaking, a bright cloud overshadowed them, and behold, a voice out of the
cloud said, "This is My beloved Son, with whom I am well-pleased; listen
to Him!" When the disciples heard this, they fell face down to the ground
and were terrified. And Jesus came to them and touched them and said, "Get
up, and do not be afraid." And lifting up their eyes, they saw no one
except Jesus Himself alone. – Matthew 17:1-8
If you read Luke’s
account, he says it was about 8 days. Is
this an error in the Bible? No, just two
different ways of accounting for time.
Matthew and Luke could have been counting the days in between these two
events where Luke could have counted the two extra days on the end. Or, since Luke uses about, He may not have
been confident in the number of days he was given. We do the same thing all the time.
Luke said that Jesus took
them up on this high mountain to pray, but while Jesus was praying, the other 3
fell asleep. While He was praying, He was transformed. This is the Greek word that we get
“metamorphosis” from. He literally
changed form. If you read Hebrews 1
& 2, the writer there is making the point that God the Son took on Human
flesh and became a man that He might die to “destroy the one holding the power
of death.” For just a minute, Jesus took
off the veil of human flesh and allowed these three mortal beings to partake of
a small piece of His glory. Remember in
Exodus 33, God told Moses that He would hide Moses in a rock and only allow
Moses to see His back for if Moses saw God’s face he would die (Exodus
33:20).
Personally, I believe
Jesus did this to bolster the disciple’s faith.
He had just crushed it with a revelation that their preconceived notion
of Messiah was wrong. The One they
thought was coming to restore Israel’s glory was to be tortured and
murdered. But in this short moment, we
are allowed to see His deity. How do we
know this was deity?
Let’s look at a few passages
that describe God’s appearance. Start
with Exodus 34. Right after Moses had
been with God, it says his face was shining.
Moses did not know it, but after speaking with God his face was shining
as a reflection of the glory of God.
Psalm 104 says that God is clothed in splendor and majesty, covering
himself with light. In Revelation 1,
John says that He has a long robe, white hair, flaming eyes, and his face shown
like the sun in its full strength. Compare that with the 3 accounts of the
transfiguration.
Matthew said His faced
shone like the sun, and His garments were as white as light. Mark said His garments were radiant and
“exceedingly white, as no launderer on earth can white them.” He apparently had a bad history with the
cleaners. Luke said he garments were
white and gleaming, literally flashing like lightning.
Remember, Peter, James,
and John were all asleep. They were
awakened by this bright light, and the first thing they saw was Jesus talking
with two others. We aren’t told how they
knew who they were, perhaps Jesus told them.
But regardless, there stand Moses and Elijah talking with Jesus about
his departure to come. Poor Peter not
knowing what else to do blurts out, “Rabbi, it is good for us to be here. Let’s
make tabernacles, one for you, and one each for Moses and Elijah. Luke spares Peter some humiliation by adding
that he did not know what he was saying.
But you know Peter; when you can’t think of what else to do, say
something!
As Peter was speaking, a
great cloud descends upon them, and a voice said to them, “This is My Son.
Listen to Him!” The disciples became so
afraid that they fell face down on the earth and were absolutely
terrified. But Jesus tenderly touches
them and says “Get up, do not be afraid.”
Man’s response to the glory of God is always terror – “a terror that
comes as a result of the manifestation of His utter other-worldliness, of His
perfect holiness, of His transcendent deity.
But in His mercy, ‘Jesus says Get up.
Do not be afraid.’” (Alistair Begg)
As they were coming
down from the mountain, Jesus commanded them, saying, "Tell the vision to
no one until the Son of Man has risen from the dead." And His disciples
asked Him, "Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?"
And He answered and said, "Elijah is coming and will restore all things; but
I say to you that Elijah already came, and they did not recognize him, but did
to him whatever they wished. So also the Son of Man is going to suffer at their
hands." Then the disciples understood that He had spoken to them about
John the Baptist. – Matthew 17:9-13
Again, we see the command
to tell no one what they saw. Jesus
wanted them to hold onto all of these things until they finally got the full
story together. Once they had the full
story, nothing would stop them – not even all the fury that hell could throw
against them. The disciples still could
not figure out that risen from the dead part.
Mark says they discussed it amongst themselves, but they never brought
it up to Jesus. They did ask him about
Elijah though.
Jesus told them that
Elijah had come, but no one recognized him, so they did to him whatever they
wanted, and they would do the same to Jesus.
At that point, the disciples understood that John the Baptist was
Elijah. John was the last of the Old
Testament prophets pointing to Jesus while Elijah was, in the mind of the Jews,
the greatest prophet.
But what does all of this
mean for us today? First, we must all
answer the question “Who do you say that I am?”
Nothing else is as important as your answer to this question. You may disagree with everything else I have
said today, but your answer to this question has eternal consequences.
Secondly, are we concerned
with the things of God, or are we like Peter and concerned with the things of
men? Has the lust of the flesh, the lust
of the eyes, or the pride of life overtaken our thinking? The only 2 places outside of the
transfiguration of Jesus that the Greek word translated “transfigure” is used
in the Bible are in Romans 12 and 2 Corinthians 3:18.
And do not be conformed
to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may
prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect. –
Romans 12:2
But we all, with
unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being
transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as from the Lord, the
Spirit. – 2 Corinthians 3:18
We cannot overcome this
world unless our minds are transformed into the mind of Christ. How?
By looking in the mirror of the Bible daily and seeing His glory. As we do that, we will be transformed into the
same image.
Third, are we dying to
self? This passage is not easy. There is some deep stuff in here that takes
careful consideration. Am I setting
aside what I want and following Jesus?
This goes hand-in-hand with question 2.
We cannot be dead to self and concerned with the things of men.
No comments:
Post a Comment