Welcome! Today we have our final installment in
our series on the reliability of the gospels. Two weeks ago we focused on
atheists’ and others’ claims that the gospels are fabrications. We looked at
when the gospels were written, using as evidence early copies, letters by
Christians, and writings by those who were neutral or even opposed to the
Christian faith. We saw strong evidence for a very small gap in time between
the events in Christ’s life and the writing of the gospels as well as
overwhelming evidence that the gospel accounts were not “doctored” in the
following centuries.
Last week we focused on claims that the gospels
must be in error based on what the gospels say. We focused in on the miracles
of Jesus because that is one of the things people have a hard time with. As the
atheist Christopher Hitchens has said, “Exceptional claims demand exceptional
evidence.” I think we showed evidence that was pretty exceptional. Our main
approach was to show that alternative explanations for how the gospels accounts
were written and came to be strongly believed as fact were all severely flawed.
For example, we talked about how if you start with the presumption that the
miracles were “added in” you find the problem that the miracles are completely
integrated into the entire story and, beyond this, essential!


