Matthew 15:1-20
We could all probably
point out examples of how easily power corrupts. This happens in the religious
as well as the political realm. History shows in particular how the mixing of
religious and political power has been a toxic combination. Examples range from
the Spanish Inquisition to the Islamic State. The Christian church has been at
its most corrupt when it has had the most political power.
Having power encourages
selfish motives, especially directed at holding onto to that power when it is
threatened. In Jesus’ day the Pharisees and teachers of the law were powerful people
in the Jewish society. People looked to them to determine how to approach and
obey God. So Jesus represented a major threat when he came and contradicted
their teaching and way of life. Their power and their honor were at stake, so
they strongly opposed Jesus.
Jesus didn’t come with
just a new interpretation of the law. He announced a whole new power structure.
He talked about the kingdom of God as though he were the king, in control. In a
democracy, the leaders are supposed to be accountable to the people. In a
monarchy the people need to be accountable to the king. Jesus announced the
kingdom of God, a kingdom “not of this world,” he would later tell Pontius
Pilate. Jesus did not become a political leader nor try to exert that type of
influence. Instead he would urge his followers to submit to earthly authority,
to “render to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” Even as he
refrained from challenging the corrupt Roman government he definitely asserted
his authority in confronting the religious and spiritual powers of his day.
The kingdom of God – or
the kingdom of heaven, as Matthew commonly refers to it – was a difficult
concept for people to grasp. So Jesus spent a lot of time explaining it.
Chapter 13 has a particular series of parables describing what the kingdom of
heaven is like. It is a kingdom that one joins by faith, not by an accident of
birth or as a consequence of human conquest. Faith is the hallmark of this
kingdom, and there is a thread of faith that ties together this part of
Matthew. What does it mean to have faith in God? For example, take the pearl of
great price. When the merchant found this amazing pearl he sold everything he
had and bought it. He was willing to take a step of faith – not a small one
either. He gave up everything else to be able to enter the kingdom. That is
radical faith, a faith that puts God first.
The end of chapter 13
describes how Jesus was rejected in his hometown. People took offense at him
because he was too familiar. It says that he was not able to do many miracles
there “because of their lack of faith.” The people could not get beyond their
preconceptions of what a prophet should be like, and that hindered the growth
of faith in their hearts.
Faith is called into
question in Chapter 14 in the death of John the Baptist. We have talked about
the crisis of faith that John apparently had in prison. Was Jesus in fact the
Messiah? Why wasn’t he acting like a great political leader who would throw off
the yoke of Rome? Jesus sent back a message that explained how his kingdom was
being established in the lives of individuals: the blind who could see, the
lame now walking, and the dead who had been raised. Jesus was doing all these
miracles as signs of the kingdom of heaven. He had the power to deliver people
from any kind of suffering.
So how do you think John
felt when his executioner appeared that night with the sword to remove his
head? Jesus was going around saving all these other people, why couldn’t he
save me? How does one hang onto faith at a time like that? Christians are still
being killed today, too, facing that same question. Does God really care? Where
is his deliverance? Is he really worthy of my faith?
Further on in chapter 14
we have the story of Jesus walking on the lake. He instructs Peter to walk on
the water, too, and Peter sets off, full of faith, but then he looks around,
feels afraid, and begins to sink. He calls to Jesus to save him. When Jesus
reaches out to catch hold of him Jesus asks, “You of little faith, why did you
doubt?” The reason Peter began to sink is that he took his eyes off Jesus and
looked at the storm around instead. Our faith is strengthened when we focus on
Jesus and what he has told us to do. As soon as our attention shifts instead to
our circumstances and fears and worries, our faith will begin to falter.
Jesus rescued Peter as he
was sinking, and as they climbed into the boat, the storm was stilled. The
disciples then worshiped Jesus, it says, and confessed him as the Son of God.
That was a statement of faith. They had seen Jesus do something amazing and
realized what that meant about his identity and how they should respond – in
worship. The seed of faith in their hearts was beginning to grow and find
expression in what they did and in what they said. That is the nature of faith.
So with that as
introduction, let’s turn to today’s passage: another of the many confrontations
between Jesus and the religious power structure of his day, represented, as I
said at the beginning, by the Pharisees and teachers of the law. They came to
Jesus from Jerusalem, the Washington DC of Israel, because they felt like their
power and control was being threatened. They needed to make a statement to the
people that they were right and Jesus was wrong. The ordinary people around may
not have had any voting rights, but the crowds were making a choice to follow
Jesus and listen to his campaign for the new “kingdom of heaven” party. The
Pharisees were outraged and wanted to expose the “fake news” of Jesus.
Then some Pharisees and
teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, “Why do your
disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before
they eat!” – Matthew 15:1-2
What was the tradition of
the elders that these religious leaders appealed to? It was something that had
developed over time. Long before, God had given the law to Moses on Mount
Sinai. This is what was written down in the first five books of the Bible,
called the Torah. As this was taught and passed down from generation to generation
various religious teachers felt the need for these laws to be interpreted more
closely and applied to specific situations in daily life. If the way to please
God was by observing the law as fully as possible, then the more detail the
better. Over the 500 years or so between the Babylonian captivity and the
appearance of Jesus, rabbis expanded and systematized this oral tradition of
detailed laws, and eventually, around 200 A.D. it was put down in written form
in what is called the Mishnah.
The intent of these laws
was to help people obey God better, but they went far beyond what God had
originally said. A simple statement like “Do not cook a young goat in its
mother’s milk,” from Exodus 23:19 became a general prohibition against any
combination of milk and meat together. Sabbath laws, as another example, came
to be prescribed in such detail that even today, some Jews will only ride in an
elevator on the Sabbath if someone else presses the buttons. They do not want
to be guilty of working on the Sabbath.
The tradition of the
elders was the very foundation of the Pharisees’ lifestyle and practices. They
believed that only their specific interpretation of what God had said was
correct. Jesus had three problems with this. One was with their intolerance. They
looked down on anyone who disagreed with them or who didn’t measure up to their
standard. Jesus spoke out many times against their pride and hypocrisy. The
second was with their assumption that they could satisfy God with their own
performance. They thought they could be holy by their own effort. There was no
need for God’s grace to forgive their sins or to compensate for any weakness.
They had their own set of rules that they could and did follow, and that was
enough. Jesus condemned their arrogant self-righteousness. Third, they were
concerned only with outward appearances. They tried to look good in front of
other people, even if their hearts were not right before God. If it did not
hurt their public image they would try to get away with what they could. Jesus
called them “whitewashed tombs” and pointed out that God would judge what they
were like on the inside, full of greed and self-indulgence, as we will see in
Matthew 23.
In this particular confrontation
with Jesus, the Pharisees brought up the issue of handwashing. We understand
the science behind handwashing for infection control, particularly in this time
of the coronavirus pandemic. But this principle was first suggested less than
200 years ago by a Hungarian doctor and not widely accepted until much later.
We know now that washing your hands frequently is one of the most important
things you can do to keep from getting sick. God obviously knows that too! But
the Pharisees are concerned here about ritual impurity. They are talking about
a religious law, not good hygiene. Mark’s version of this passage adds that
their rules for washing extended to cups, pitchers, and kettles.
Ritual impurity is still
observed in many cultures around the world. I remember one time in Nepal I took
a drink and set my cup down on the fully enclosed lid of the water filter. A
friend told me that in doing so I had defiled all the water in the filter. I
removed the cup immediately, and he said that it didn’t matter, because no one
else had noticed it. I learned that purity is not an absolute condition but is
based on appearances. But I also heard of low-caste people getting beaten up
for taking a drink from the common water tap in a high-caste village. So
defilement can be a serious business. It wasn’t so long ago even in this
country that a black person could be prosecuted for drinking from a whites-only
water fountain. That was not a hygiene issue either, but more like what the
Pharisees were concerned about.
Jesus
replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your
tradition? For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’ and ‘Anyone who curses
their father or mother is to be put to death.’ But you say that if anyone
declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is
‘devoted to God,’ they are not to ‘honor their father
or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your
tradition. – Matthew 15:3-6
Jesus does not deny that
handwashing is a good idea. He takes issue with their trusting in a ritual that
does not have any spiritual benefit. Even more so, he condemns the way they put
their traditions above the law of God. The Pharisees would make excuses to
avoid what was really important, namely obeying what God had actually said. To
circumvent a material obligation to their parents they had created this
loophole: they could promise to God whatever they should have given their
parents. That would allow them to continue to pursue their own selfish
purposes. They would only be pretending to put God first.
Jesus makes it clear elsewhere
that love for one’s parents should be subjugated to one’s love for God and
commitment to Jesus. You may recall the verse from chapter 10 where he says,
“Whoever loves their father and mother more than me is not worthy of me.” There
may be times when God expects us to disobey our parents to be able to obey him.
But that does not mean we cease to honor our parents. Sometimes we honor our
parents best when we obey God first. What Jesus is condemning in our passage
today is pretense and selfishness.
You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he
prophesied about you:
The reason Jesus spoke out
so strongly against hypocrisy was not just because it hardens a person’s heart
against the redemptive work of God in them, but it is also devastating to
others who see through the façade of the person’s behavior and realize just how
corrupt they actually are. A prime example of this is when we condemn something
in someone else that we actually do ourselves. This can be so damaging to our
witness as Christians and another reason why we need to be extra-careful in how
we present ourselves in the current climate of political polarization. Someone
has observed that when we point our finger at someone else, we still have three
fingers pointing back at ourselves. Those fingers should remind us to examine
ourselves for whatever we are accusing someone else of.
These people honor me with
their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Our words need to reflect what is
actually in our hearts. We may say what we think we believe, but our behavior
will indicate what we actually believe. You may have seen the internet meme
making the rounds in various forms that says, “The world is changed by your
example, not by your opinion.” This is basically just another way of saying
that actions speak louder than words. Actions reveal what is in our hearts, and
that is the part that God is concerned about. Honoring him with our lips is not
enough. If our hearts are not in the right place our worship becomes
meaningless, this says. We may follow some rules that we feel capable of
following, but we will not be loving God with all our heart and our neighbor as
ourselves – something that is impossible except by the power and discernment of
the Holy Spirit living within us.
This quote from Isaiah 29
is a call for transparency. A couple of verses further on in that chapter,
Isaiah writes, “Woe to those who go to great depths to hide their plans from
the Lord, who do their work in darkness and think, ‘Who sees us? Who will know?’” Nothing is
hidden from God. We don’t fool him with our words. He sees right through us:
knowing our deepest secrets and our darkest motives.
Jesus called the crowd
to him and said, “Listen and understand. What goes
into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their
mouth, that is what defiles them.”
Then the disciples came
to him and asked, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard
this?”
He replied, “Every
plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the
roots. Leave them; they are blind guides. If the blind lead the blind, both
will fall into a pit.” – Matthew 15:10-14
Jesus flips their
understanding of defilement on its head. Ritual defilement had been defined in
the Old Testament as something that happens to a person from an external
source, for example, if a person were to touch a dead body. Does Jesus intend
to nullify all those rules? No wonder the Pharisees were offended and the
disciples worried. It appeared that Jesus was abandoning the old covenant. How
could he go against hundreds of years of tradition? What the Pharisees could
never accept was that Jesus did have the right to rewrite the rules. They
refused to accept his authority as king.
However, Jesus had said in
the Sermon on the Mount that he had not come to abolish the Law but to fulfill
it. In the same way that he was the final, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice
that removed the need for further sacrifices, so he would also bear the shame
of all defilement, providing true and lasting purification and the restoration
of honor. He fulfilled the requirements of the law so that anyone can be
acceptable to God through faith in him – sins forgiven and shame removed.
God’s truth will
ultimately prevail. Every lie will eventually be uprooted. The wheat and the weeds
might appear to be growing together with equal success, as we talked about in
chapter 13, but in the end they will be separated. Jesus refers to the
Pharisees as blind guides several times. They are meant to be leading the
people into a right relationship with God, but they are failing in that
themselves. Anyone attempting to follow them along their self-righteous path
would end up at the same dead end: convinced that they were doing okay but
actually heading further and further away from true repentance and salvation by
faith.
Peter said, “Explain
the parable to us.”
“Are you still so
dull?” Jesus asked them. “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth
goes into the stomach and then out of the body? But the things that come out of
a person’s mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of
the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false
testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with
unwashed hands does not defile them.” – Matthew 15:15-20
Peter is so confused by
what he has heard that he asks Jesus to explain, even though there is no story
to interpret as there would normally be with a parable. Jesus had taught in the
Sermon on the Mount that sin originates in the heart (as lust and anger, for
example) and can make a person guilty even before they actually do anything
wrong. Peter was not making the connection. Jesus was saying something radical
here. Defilement comes from inside a person, as a result of their own evil
thoughts, rather than being imposed on them by external factors. The sins that
Jesus lists here are indeed actions; however, he makes clear that they begin in
a person’s mind: anger turns to murder, lust turns to adultery and sexual
immorality, greed turns to theft, jealousy and resentment turn to false
testimony and slander. These thoughts begin the defilement before the person
actually follows through on the sinful action. We are guilty of sin before we
even do anything.
In getting rid of ritual
purification such as handwashing, Jesus is also doing away with all the food
laws that had been so rigorously followed by the Pharisees. Mark actually
states this as a parenthetical comment in his version of this passage: “In
saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.” (Mark 7:19)
We know that Peter still
couldn’t quite accept this new definition of clean and unclean. He would need
to be reminded of it again much later in Acts 10 when he saw a vision on a
rooftop in Joppa. You probably recall the story. The vision was of a large
sheet being lowered containing all kinds of four-footed animals as well as
reptiles and birds. Some of these would surely have been considered unclean
according to the Torah. He heard a voice tell him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and
eat.” Peter replied, “Surely not, Lord, I have never eaten anything impure or
unclean.” The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure
that God has made clean.” This happened three times, and by the end Peter was
still wondering what this vision meant. It was only after he was with
Cornelius, the Gentile centurion in Caesarea who had summoned him, that he
realized that God wanted him to accept all people equally. Gentiles would not
need to become Jews to be able to receive salvation through faith in Jesus.
Jesus was hinting at this
paradigm shift back in Matthew 15. Jews would normally have been defiled by
coming in contact with a Gentile. It could be assumed that the Gentile was
eating unclean foods and not following all the other practices for ritual
purification. So when Jesus stated that defilement could not be passed on by
touch, he was, in effect, beginning to break down this barrier for contact
between Jews and Gentiles. We will see that our story for next week continues
this theme in Jesus’ interaction with the Canaanite woman, a Gentile from whom
Jews would normally have kept their distance.
So what does this passage in Matthew 15 mean for us today? We have no tradition of ritual purification that we are trusting in to make us acceptable to God. But we do need to be careful that we do not fall into the pit with the Pharisees. I can think of three ways to guard against this:
2. I need to beware of thinking that I am doing okay as a Christian because I am doing or not doing certain things. My acceptability before God is only because of what Jesus did on the cross. My behavior needs to flow out of my love for him, as I live in daily dependence on his grace and power at work within me. I need to take up my cross daily to follow him, sacrificing my selfish desires and independent self-effort.
3. I need to remember that God knows everything about me and loves me anyway. This frees me to be honest with other people and not try to impress them with outward appearances. Christ’s power is made perfect in my weakness. My actions do matter, but they need to flow out of the redeemed condition of my heart. Then my words and actions will align with each other and have integrity. People are repelled by pretense but are drawn to authenticity.
No comments:
Post a Comment