Welcome! Today we
continue our series on Shame and Honor, a series in which we hopefully are
becoming better acquainted with honor-shame cultures and use this understanding
to better grasp the heart of God towards people. A secondary goal is to become
better able to relate to people in honor-shame cultures and present the gospel
to them in a way that resonates with them. I encourage you, if you have missed either
or both previous messages in the series, to look them up at our website.
In the first message in
the series, one of the things we talked about was that honor-shame cultures
tend to occur in places and situations in which there are very strong family or
community bonds, where nothing is secret, and where interacting with family or
community is not only a daily thing, but even an hourly thing; it is
ever-present. There aren’t a lot of places or communities that can be
appropriately characterized as honor-shame cultures here in America, but in the
first message I mentioned that the military is an example of a culture that has
some honor-shame characteristics. This is because people who serve in the military
typically work and live on base, separate from the community and culture at
large. In addition, people in the military are taught and continually re-taught
that supporting your fellow soldier and obeying your superiors is everything:
that quite literally life and death can depend on it.
After talking with some
people here after the second message, it dawned on me that performing arts
communities also tend to have some honor-shame characteristics. Although people
who, for example, act, tend to go home to their own locations at night, they
put in tremendous hours doing intense things closely together – and this leads
to the formation of a tight-knit community. The community also, figuratively,
lives or dies together, as success of a production depends on not only the
actors doing their part (pun intended) but also all the support personnel performing
their roles (pun also intended). It is a high-pressure environment that is also
heavily judged by outside critics, so that good reviews lead to honor and bad
ones lead to shame.
A third example of a
very tight-knit community is, in at least some cases, missionary teams. We saw
an example of one such team in the video last week on Mercy Ships, where a floating
hospital that is really a complete community lives together to provide
desperately needed medical treatment in impoverished countries. Everything is
done on-ship, from food preparation to providing schooling to having your own
fire department.
In the ancient world, including
the world of both the Old and New Testaments, as well as in most parts of the
world today, communities were incredibly tight-knit, and people depended on one
another for the communities to thrive or even just survive. The core units
within such communities were (and are) families, not just what we call
“nuclear” families with parents and their immediate children, but extended
families, with aunts and uncles and nieces and nephews and cousins and other
relations. Often extended families lived in essentially the same house, with
new additions adding on, well, new additions to the house.
As I mentioned earlier
in the series, your family lineage was a critical part of your honor status –
your ascribed honor. But in addition to this, your achieved honor could also have
a severe effect on the honor of your entire family. Talk about pressure!
We see an interesting
example of this in Mark 3. Although this account is early in Jesus’ ministry, it
takes place after Jesus has chosen His disciples, miraculously healed people
and taught with unprecedented wisdom and authority, and He has attracted large
crowds that follow Him wherever He goes. Turning to verse 20:
Then Jesus entered a house, and
again a crowd gathered, so that He and His disciples were not even able to eat. When His family heard about
this, they went to take charge of Him, for they said, “He is out of his mind.”
– Mark 3:20-21
What is going on here?
Jesus’ family thinks Jesus’ has lost it, gone nuts, and they are coming to get
Him. Now, from your newly acquired honor-shame framework, understand that they
aren’t just doing this out of compassion; they are doing this also because
Jesus is becoming a threat to the honor of the entire family!
Now the passage goes on
to talk about how teachers of the Law came down specifically from Jerusalem to
argue against Jesus – again, this is a sign of just how “bad” things have
become for the family. It’s like Jesus is not just in the local papers but is
now attracting national notoriety. The passage explains how Jesus defends
Himself, but I want to jump down to verse 31 where the family shows up.
Then Jesus’ mother and brothers arrived.
Standing outside, they sent someone in to call Him. A crowd was sitting around
Him, and they told Him, “Your mother and brothers are outside looking for you.”
“Who are My mother and My brothers?” He asked. Then He looked at those seated
in a circle around Him and said, “Here are My mother and My brothers! Whoever
does God’s will is My brother and sister and mother.” – Mark 3:31-35
Hopefully with your
honor-shame eyes you see just how shocking this statement really is! These
people are strangers! The statement is a double shock – a shock in how
inclusive He is of these people around Him, and a shock in how dismissive He is
of His kin.
Mark doesn’t tell us
what happens next. Does His family leave? Or do they follow along with the
crowd for a while? In any case, we do know that eventually His family does come
to see that Jesus is exactly who He claims He is. He doesn’t normally just come
out and say it, because He is keeping to a schedule, and wants to build into
His disciples before He is killed. But we do learn that they become believers.
Now, again, the shock
is not just how He treats His family, it is also that He “adopts” anyone who is
willing to follow Him, who “does God’s will.” Unfortunately for us, I am afraid
that we tend to be tone deaf to the amazing promise of this passage. It’s like
when unbelievers hear the word Easter and all they think about is chocolate
bunnies. We think it “sounds nice” that Jesus calls followers by family terms,
but we tend to think He is just using flowery language.
Beyond the structure of
the family was the clan, families united by a common ancestor as indicated by
their lineage. Jews were altogether of one clan, in this sense, in that they were
all children of Abraham. They took pride in this, and generally kept quite
separate from gentiles. But they also took some pride in their lineages from
various sons of Jacob. You see this in many names – the prophetess Anna in Luke
2 is described as a daughter of Asher. Paul describes himself as a son of
Benjamin. Even Jesus is described as of the tribe of Judah. And then the
priests were all descendants of Levi.
Jesus and the Jews he
interacted with repeatedly used the phrase “children of Abraham.” We in the
west have a very difficult time seeing this at all, because it doesn’t matter
much to us, but it was an essential part of Jesus’ arguments. Let me give you
an example, from Luke 19. I will back up a few verses to give context and to
talk about other honor-shame dynamics in the passage:
Jesus entered Jericho and was passing through. A
man was there by the name of Zacchaeus; he was a chief tax collector and was
wealthy. He wanted to see who Jesus was, but because he was short he could not
see over the crowd. So he ran ahead and climbed a sycamore-fig tree to see him,
since Jesus was coming that way. When Jesus reached the spot, He looked up and
said to him, “Zacchaeus, come down immediately. I must stay at your house
today.” So he came down at once and welcomed Him gladly. – Luke 19:1-6
Now tax collectors were
hated by the Jews, because they tended to overcharge and well, they came to you
and took your money. Tax collectors in Israel were Jewish, but they were viewed
almost as traitors, because they worked for the Romans. Note here that
Zacchaeus was not only a tax collector, but a chief tax collector. It says he was rich; note that he had become
rich off the money of those whose taxes he had collected. As a result,
Zacchaeus was not a popular person. He was famous in way, but really a better
term would be infamous. What was his honor-shame rating? Low in honor, high in
shame. This would apply not only to him but to his wife, his children, and even
more distant relations (assuming he had
an immediate family – the passage does not say).
All the people saw this and began to mutter, “He
has gone to be the guest of a sinner.” But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the
Lord, “Look, Lord! Here and now I give half of my possessions to the poor, and
if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the
amount.” Jesus said to him, “Today salvation has come to this house, because
this man, too, is a son of Abraham. For the Son of Man came to seek and to save
the lost.” – Luke 19:7-10
There is an interesting
play on words here – when it says salvation has come to this house, in Hebrew
or Aramaic this would be a word very close to the name Jesus; recall in the
first chapter of Matthew the son of Mary was given the name Jesus because He
would “save His people from their sins.” So, when Jesus says, “Today salvation
has come to this house,” with the wordplay, He also means, “Today I have come to this house.”
But the main point I
want to make here is that Jesus says why
He came to Zacchaeus: it is because of his kinship! He is a son of Abraham,
just like they are. Even though Zacchaeus’ achieved honor is extremely negative,
his name, his kinship, overrides this. Ironically, Jesus understands the value
of kinship even better than they do.
The message here that
Jesus was demonstrating to His disciples is that there is nobody so shameful,
so low on the honor-shame spectrum, that His salvation is not available to them
if they repent and called Him Lord. The word “lost” is apollymi. This is an extremely strong word; it is most often
translated in the Bible as destroyed or perished. The Son of Man came to seek
and save not just some person wandering around who doesn’t know where he is,
but even people who have destroyed their lives, people who through their sin
and shame have destroyed their connection not only to their kin, but to God
Himself.
Here is a second
example, from Luke 13. Again, I will back up a bit for context:
On a Sabbath Jesus was teaching in one of the
synagogues, and a woman was there who had been crippled by a spirit for
eighteen years. She was bent over and could not straighten up at all. When
Jesus saw her, He called her forward and said to her, “Woman, you are set free
from your infirmity.” Then He put His hands on her, and immediately she
straightened up and praised God. Indignant because Jesus had healed on the
Sabbath, the synagogue leader said to the people, “There are six days for work.
So come and be healed on those days, not on the Sabbath.” – Luke 13:10-14
This woman was another
person at the bottom of the honor-shame spectrum. She had endured 18 years as a
severe cripple. Typically, people assumed people like this were in such
circumstances because of something they had done that was sinful or shameful
(either them or their families). There is no evidence of this in this passage.
Note that the synagogue
leader is indignant because she dared
to come and be healed on a Sabbath! He is mad at the woman. This is a different
twist than elsewhere in the Gospels where the officials’ anger is directed squarely
at Jesus. In some ways I find attacking this woman even more offensive. He is
presuming to speak for Jesus, as if
to say, of course, Jesus wouldn’t want to heal people on the Sabbath, so leave
him alone on this day! This is offensive because (a) he doesn’t speak for Jesus
who has had nothing to do with the synagogue leaders (b) they have never healed
anyone – so who are they to presume that their honor gives them the right to
speak for Him? (c) they don’t have a clue what they are talking about.
Note that how Jesus
responds next will strongly affect His own honor status. If He allows their
statement to go unchallenged, He will essentially be ceding his status and
agreeing that He is subservient (and subservient in honor) to them.
The Lord answered him, “You hypocrites! Doesn’t
each of you on the Sabbath untie your ox or donkey from the stall and lead it out
to give it water? Then should not this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan
has kept bound for eighteen long years, be set free on the Sabbath day from
what bound her?” When He said this, all His opponents were humiliated, but the
people were delighted with all the wonderful things He was doing. – Luke
13:15-17
His opponents were shamed. That is exactly what humiliated
means. They had presumed to speak for Jesus publicly without His permission, and
in response He shamed them publicly by disagreeing not only with their premise
but also with their implicit assumption that Jesus was subservient to them.
The argument is
stinging – they don’t even act this way towards their animals. This woman,
whose honor is infinitely above that of livestock, and not only this – did you
notice it this time? – she is a daughter
of Abraham, so she has the same basic ascribed honor that they do! So
Jesus’ response is fundamentally an attack on their honor – how can you treat
your kin worse than your animals?
Now you may feel a bit
of discomfort when you think about how Jesus keeps tying His role to the
kinship of the Jewish people – the sons and daughters of Abraham. Well, I
remind you of the Roman centurion in Matthew 8. This person, who was not
Jewish, asked Jesus to heal his servant. I am sure the disciples were amazed
that Jesus would even talk with
respect to this person! Jesus asked if He should go with him and heal him, but
the centurion said that he knew it was not necessary for Jesus to physically be
there; He obviously had the authority to do it from anywhere.
When Jesus heard this, He was
amazed and said to those following Him, “Truly I tell you, I have not found anyone in
Israel with such great faith. I say to you that many will come from the east
and the west, and will take their places at the feast with Abraham, Isaac and
Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. But the subjects of the
kingdom will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping
and gnashing of teeth.” – Matt. 8:10-12
The “many” that will
come will be fully accepted into the future community of God. On what basis do
they enter this community? Through faith in Christ. What about those who are
kin of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob? Their kinship connection will not be the basis of whether they will
enter and partake of heaven.
Jesus also refers to
clan when confronting those who plot to kill Him. He argues that by doing such
shameful actions, they even lose their kinship! Again, we tend to gloss over
such arguments, but look at the force of Jesus’ argument in John 8 and think
about how this must have made Jesus’ listeners feel:
To the Jews who had believed Him,
Jesus said, “If you hold to My teaching, you are really My disciples. Then you will know the truth,
and the truth will set you free.” They
[unbelievers] answered Him, “We are Abraham’s descendants and have never been
slaves of anyone. How can you say that we shall be set free?” – John 8:31-33
Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, everyone
who sins is a slave to sin. Now a slave has no permanent place in the family,
but a son belongs to it forever. So if the Son sets you
free, you will be free indeed. I know that you are
Abraham’s descendants. Yet you are looking for a way to kill Me, because you
have no room for My word. I am telling you what I have
seen in the Father’s presence, and you are doing what you have heard from your
father.” – John 8:34-38
“Abraham is our father,” they
answered. “If you
were Abraham’s children,” said Jesus, “then you would do what Abraham did. As it is, you are looking for
a way to kill Me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God.
Abraham did not do such things. You are doing the works
of your own father.” – John 8:39-41a
“We are not illegitimate children,”
they protested. “The only Father we have is God himself.” Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would
love Me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on My own; God sent Me. Why is My language not clear
to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. You
belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s
desires. – John 8:41b-44
Do you see
how this argument speaks so powerfully to those who rested on their “laurels”
of kinship? Jesus went even further by contrasting following Him with following
one’s own family; the assumption in these verses is that one’s own family is
not following Christ. Jesus basically said that when this is the case, you must
choose Him first. From Luke 14:
Large crowds were traveling with
Jesus, and turning to them He said: “If anyone comes to Me and does not hate father
and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, even their own
life—such a person cannot be My disciple. And whoever
does not carry their cross and follow Me cannot be My disciple. – Luke 14:25-27
How did
this sound to those who thought family was everything? And from Matthew 10:
Whoever acknowledges Me before others, I will
also acknowledge before My Father in heaven. But whoever disowns Me before
others, I will disown before My Father in heaven. Do not
suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring
peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn ‘a man
against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against
her mother-in-law—a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’ - Matt. 10:32-36
Anyone who loves their father or
mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; anyone who loves their son or daughter
more than Me is not worthy of Me. Whoever does not take up their cross and follow Me
is not worthy of Me. Whoever finds their life will lose
it, and whoever loses their life for My sake will find it. – Matt. 10:37-39
This
teaching is hard for us, but even harder for those for whom family was above
everything. Jesus’
hard words were explaining that when the various commandments of the Ten
Commandments come into conflict with one another, it should always be the first commandment that takes precedence:
to love (honor) the Lord above all others. To put anything else in front of the
Lord (including family) is to make an idol out of it.
Now, let’s talk about
what happened in the Book of Acts and is explained in the letters of the New
Testament. In Acts 2, a new family, a new community was born. The early
believers truly lived like a family:
They devoted themselves to the
apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer. Everyone was filled with awe
at the many wonders and signs performed by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common.
They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had
need. Every day they continued to meet together in the
temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and
sincere hearts, praising God and enjoying the favor of
all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being
saved. – Acts 2:42-47
The early believers
began calling one another brother and sister. And they lived with a love for
one another, empowered by the Holy Spirit, that was breathtaking. Before long,
Rome realized that they were a threat, because they were growing like crazy. It
reminds me of how the Egyptians responded when the clan of Jacob’s descendants
also grew like crazy there. In both cases, the response was persecution.
The New Testament
letters repeatedly refer to our new position in the family and clan of Jesus.
This position is for all who call on the name of Jesus, Jew and Gentile. I’ve
selected just a few such passages:
So in Christ Jesus you are all
children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ
have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither
Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you
are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ,
then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. – Gal. 3:26-29
Abraham is mentioned
again; but here, it is saying that the true children of Abraham are those who
put their faith in Christ. As such, we are also children of God, and we are in
the clan of God.
Therefore, remember that formerly you who are
Gentiles by birth and called “uncircumcised” by those who call themselves “the
circumcision” (which is done in the body by human hands)— remember that at that
time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and
foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the
world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near
by the blood of Christ. – Eph. 2:11-13
For He Himself is our peace, who has made the
two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility,
by setting aside in His flesh the law with its commands and regulations. His
purpose was to create in Himself one new humanity out of the two, thus making
peace, and in one body to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by
which He put to death their hostility. He came and preached peace to you who
were far away and peace to those who were near. For through Him we both have
access to the Father by one Spirit. – Eph. 2:14-18
Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and
strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people and also members of his
household, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ
Jesus Himself as the chief cornerstone. – Eph. 2:19-20
We now live in God’s
home! Again, the honor-shame context is that we are now members of His family!
We are an add-on to His home, because the family has grown
But you are a chosen people, a
royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare
the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. Once you were not a people,
but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you
have received mercy. – I Peter 2:9-10
Note how we are a
people now, a community, a kinship.
Now, I have only a
little time left, but this is where I want to ask the most controversial
question of the day. If we are to be a community of believers, how should we
live? Should we live as an honor-shame community?
I believe the answer
from Scripture is YES. But it is different from the honor-shame communities of the
prevailing culture in Bible times and it is also different from the honor-shame
communities of today. How is it different?
One area is membership.
In traditional honor-shame communities, membership is usually closed. It is
based on your family and your clan. These are things you cannot change. But as
we have seen, in the New Testament, membership is based on whether you have
become a believer. In a traditional honor-shame community, new members are only
added through birth, but in the New Testament community, new members are added
through conversion, through being born again. In fact, in an honor-shame
community, baptism – which is something we do because Jesus instructed us to do
it – is symbolic of more than the individualistic decision to follow Christ; it
is symbolic of becoming a part of this new honor-shame community of faith, of
leaving the old community behind, if necessary. Just a note on this – you see
repeatedly in the New Testament examples of entire households becoming
believers at once. This was a result of
the extremely close family bonds back then. It wasn’t that family members were
joining just because the patriarch of the family was joining – this is why
Jesus warns people that following Him may split apart even families, as we read
earlier – but it was that they had such respect and love of the family leader
that seeing him choose to follow Jesus was an extremely influential testimony
to them that it must be true and that following Jesus was the right decision
for them also to make.
In honor-shame
cultures, and I am thinking here specifically of Muslim cultures, what
sometimes happens from what I have read is that the husband becomes a believer
only after reading through the entire Bible and having many deep conversations
with another believer or small group of believers. The wife only peripherally
takes part in these discussions, if at all. She is busy making meals, taking
care of the children, etc. When the husband becomes a believer, he simply informs his wife that the entire family
will now follow Jesus. She agrees, because culturally that is what you must do.
In multiple Muslim countries, to become a follower of Jesus means that you are
breaking the law, and if you are found out, you will be arrested. One reason
that Christianity has been slow to grow in these countries is that after such a
husband is arrested, the wife and children go back to her father – to her
family, and she again lives as a Muslim. Because she never personally became a
believer, she may even feel relieved to be back home. When authorities come and
question her about who her husband was associating with, she feels no
compunction against telling them everything she knows, and unfortunately this
leads to even more arrests!
We will talk more next
week about various dynamics of living in honor-shame communities, including the
Christian community of the New Testament, but finally today I want to highlight
one additional difference between traditional honor-shame communities and
communities of believers as prescribed in the New Testament. This is in the purpose of shame. Yes, both types of
communities have and use shame. In a traditional honor-shame community, when
someone does something bad, he and his entire family lose honor. In severe cases,
other families no longer associate with him or his family – they are shunned.
This serves as a kind of protection mechanism for the community – it serves as
a powerful warning to other families to do the right thing – or else.
Certainly, Christian communities
shouldn’t do this, right? Well, wrong. Paul prescribes exactly this in I Cor.
5:
It is actually reported that there
is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that even pagans do not tolerate:
A man is sleeping with his father’s wife. And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have
gone into mourning and have put out of your fellowship the man who has been
doing this? For my part, even though I am not
physically present, I am with you in spirit. As one who is present with you in
this way, I have already passed judgment in the name of our Lord Jesus on the
one who has been doing this. So when you are assembled
and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present,
hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh,
so that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord. – I Cor. 5:1-5
Your boasting is not good. Don’t
you know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch of dough? Get rid of the old yeast, so
that you may be a new unleavened batch—as you really are. For Christ, our
Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Therefore let us
keep the Festival, not with the old bread leavened with malice and wickedness,
but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. – I Cor. 5:6-8
I wrote to you in my letter not to
associate with sexually immoral people—not at all meaning the people of this
world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case
you would have to leave this world. But now I am writing to you that you must not
associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually
immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not
even eat with such people. – I Cor. 5:9-11
What business is it of mine to
judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside.
“Expel the wicked person from among you.” – I Cor. 5:12-13
Did you catch in the
passage the reason Paul gives for
doing this? It is so that his “spirit may be saved.” The idea is that expulsion
in the New Testament community is not permanent,
but only until the person repents, admitting their wrong behavior and
discontinuing it. At that point, the person is to be re-admitted back into the community and fully restored. Paul
mentions this also in Galatians 6:
Brothers and sisters, if someone is
caught in a sin, you who live by the Spirit should restore that person gently.
But watch yourselves, or you also may be tempted. Carry each other’s burdens,
and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ. – Gal. 6:1-2
Again, the goal is
restoration into the community. The following short table summarizes some of
the differences we have talked about between traditional and New Testament
communities.
Traditional H-S Community
|
New Testament Community
|
|
Membership
|
By birth family
|
By faith
|
Purpose of shaming
|
To keep others “in line”
|
To bring about repentance
|
Restoration
|
Nearly impossible, limited
|
Fully upon repentance
|
We haven’t had time to
explore the practicals here of how we are to live in community; this would be
an entire additional series! But I want you to see that when Paul and the other
New Testament writers talk about how to live in their letters, they are writing
in second person plural (y’all) not just because they are writing to multiple
people, but also because the instructions are community-focused! We in the west
often barely understand what living in a community is about, as we live very
isolated lives. We may have our small circle of close friends, but even there
the closeness is often just based on hanging out together. The New Testament
community is meant to be miraculous: miraculous in the depth of love people
have for one another, miraculous in that it is led by Christ who is God
Himself, and miraculous in that outsiders are hungry to join it (and welcomed
with love when they do). The miraculous New Testament community is often made
up of those the traditional community shuns – the Zacchaeus’s and bent-over
women and centurions. Let us seek the Lord for such a community among us!
No comments:
Post a Comment