Moriah
Welcome! Today
is our third week of exploring the findings of archaeology that confirm the
truths of the Bible. As we did last week, we are going to look at several
seemingly unrelated passages, and then as we look at archaeology, we will put
these passages together. Our first passage we will look at today should be a
very familiar one involving Abraham.
Two weeks ago,
we looked at the location of Mamre, a place where Abraham stayed for some time
with his extended family and his animals, where Abraham made an altar to God,
and where God told Abraham that he and Sarah would have a son, despite the
seeming impossibility that that could happen. God did indeed give them a son,
named Isaac, and today’s passage takes place a number of years after Isaac is
born.
Some time
later God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” “Here I am,” he replied.
Then God said, “Take your son, your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the
region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will
show you.” – Genesis 22:1-2
This was a
shocking, unimaginable request. Over many years, God had shown special care and
concern for Abraham, instructing him to leave his home in Ur and go to a place
God would show him. God promised to make of him a great nation, to bless him
and make his name great. He was told that all nations, all peoples would be
blessed through him. God repeated and added to promise after promise, revealing
that it would be through his son Isaac that the promises would be kept; through
Isaac the great nation would come, and through Isaac, all nations, all peoples,
would be blessed.
So how could
God now ask Abraham to sacrifice his son? What about the promises? If it was
through Isaac that that all this would happen, then the death of Isaac meant
the death of a nation, and the blessing that was to be for all peoples would be
for none.
Early the
next morning Abraham got up and loaded his donkey. He took with him two of his
servants and his son Isaac. When he had cut enough wood for the burnt offering,
he set out for the place God had told him about. On the third day Abraham
looked up and saw the place in the distance. He said to his servants, “Stay
here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and
then we will come back to you.” – Genesis 22:3-5
Why did
Abraham dismiss the servants? Probably because he did not want them to see what
Abraham was about to do. Also they might have been able to stop him. The reason
the servants came on the journey at all is probably because Abraham was an old
man at this time, and needed help with a multi-day journey.
Abraham
took the wood for the burnt offering and placed it on his son Isaac, and he
himself carried the fire and the knife. As the two of them went on together,
Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, “Father?” “Yes, my son?” Abraham
replied. “The fire and wood are here,” Isaac said, “but where is the lamb for
the burnt offering?” Abraham answered, “God Himself will provide the lamb for
the burnt offering, my son.” And the two of them went on together. – Genesis 22:6-8
Now we don’t
know exactly how old Isaac is at this time, but we have two convincing clues
that Isaac is a young adult, not a small child. First, the word used to
describe him in the previous chapter is the same word used to describe
Abraham’s servants in this chapter. Second, Isaac is old enough to carry what
had to be a large and heavy quantity of wood over some distance, a distance
large enough so that the servants would not be able to hear anything that
happened. Note that the wood was cut before their journey even began and loaded
up on a donkey, so it had to be a lot of wood.
When they
reached the place God had told him about, Abraham built an altar there and
arranged the wood on it. He bound his son Isaac and laid him on the altar, on
top of the wood. Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his
son. – Genesis 22:9-10
It is
remarkable to me that Isaac does not resist at any time. He could have
certainly overpowered his father. I am sure he understood what was happening,
although he did not understand why. And his father likewise continued to do
what he had been told to do, though I do not doubt it was with many tears.
Despite what was happening, Isaac remained completely obedient to the will of
his father. But as you know, this story does not end as it appears to at this
point.
But the
angel of the Lord called out to him from heaven, “Abraham! Abraham!” “Here I
am,” he replied. “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” He said. “Do not do anything
to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from Me
your son, your only son.” Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram
caught by its horns. He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt
offering instead of his son. So Abraham called that place The Lord Will
Provide. And to this day it is said, “On the mountain of the Lord it will be
provided.” – Genesis 22:11-14
I want to
point out that this is an odd thing that is said “to this day.” It would be one
thing to simply say that Lord provides, or more precisely, the Lord provided.
It is interesting that the tense is future, the Lord Will Provide, Jehovah
Jireh. But the final verse is even more specific. It says that on the
mountain of the Lord it will be provided. This mountain? And what
will be provided? We will come back to that question, but let’s now move on. Let
us look, in our second passage, at an event in the life of David.
Now David is
described by God as a man after God’s own heart. David certainly was a sinner,
as we all are, and a number of his personal failings – most famously the
situation with Bathsheba – revealed his sinful nature publicly and
spectacularly. But despite his failings, David kept returning to the Lord. His
Psalms reveal a heart that truly burns for God, for his own life to be one used
by God, and for God’s glory to be revealed. The contrast between David and
Saul, who eventually abandoned all pretense of serving the Lord, could not be
greater. But we are going to look at one of David’s failings. This account is
given in 2 Samuel 24.
Again the
anger of the Lord burned against Israel, and He incited David against them,
saying, “Go and take a census of Israel and Judah.” So the king said to Joab
and the army commanders with him, “Go throughout the tribes of Israel from Dan
to Beersheba and enroll the fighting men, so that I may know how many there
are.” But Joab replied to the king, “May the Lord your God multiply the troops
a hundred times over, and may the eyes of my lord the king see it. But why does
my lord the king want to do such a thing?” The king’s word, however, overruled
Joab and the army commanders; so they left the presence of the king to enroll
the fighting men of Israel. – 2 Samuel 24:1-4
Now, we need
to discuss that first sentence, which can be confusing to understand. I think
we can understand it better by looking at the opening of the parallel account
in I Chronicles 21.
Satan
rose up against Israel and incited David to take a census of Israel. So David
said to Joab and the commanders of the troops, “Go and count the Israelites
from Beersheba to Dan. Then report back to me so that I may know how many there
are.” But Joab replied, “May the Lord multiply his troops a hundred times over.
My lord the king, are they not all my lord’s subjects? Why does my lord want to
do this? Why should he bring guilt on Israel?” The king’s word, however,
overruled Joab; so Joab left and went throughout Israel and then came back to
Jerusalem. – 1 Chronicles 21:1-4
In the 2
Samuel passage, the opening statement “Again the anger of the Lord burned
against Israel” should be taken to be a summary statement of the rest of the
chapter. This is a common speech pattern in 1 and 2 Samuel, as well as in
earlier books of the Bible. And when it says “He incited David” in contrast to
what we have here which is that Satan incited David, I believe the way to
understand this is that God allowed Satan to tempt David, knowing that David
would fail, and that the result would be judgment against Israel that was due
against them because of their continued sin.
Now, David
gave in to the temptation. He wants to see how large his army is. How mighty is
his kingdom? How many men able to fight does he have in the whole land? Note
that this kind of thinking usually is accompanied with an unhealthy, or shall
we say, sinful, view of yourself as the reason for your success, rather than
God. The truth is that we are stewards, not owners, of our possessions, and
whether we have just enough, or far more than that, it is the Lord who is giver
of these things.
But beyond
this, it is harder to trust the Lord when you don’t know just what you have.
Counting your stuff makes it easy for you to say you trust the Lord, but
that is something else entirely. We in America have been blessed with
abundance, but this abundance is also a temptation for us to rely on ourselves
rather than the Lord. We have insurance. We have retirement accounts. I’m not
saying any of these things are sin. But to put your trust in these things and
forget the Lord is sin.
Quite
ironically, it is David himself who wrote in Psalm 20:7, “Some trust in
chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the Lord our God.” If
you really trust in the name of the Lord your God, you do not need to
count your chariots and horses, do you? I believe this is why taking a census
in the Law of Moses included an interesting requirement. From Exodus 30:
Then the
Lord said to Moses, “When you take a census of the Israelites to count them,
each one must pay the Lord a ransom for his life at the time he is counted.
Then no plague will come on them when you number them. Each one who crosses
over to those already counted is to give a half shekel, according to the
sanctuary shekel, which weighs twenty gerahs. This half shekel is an offering
to the Lord. All who cross over, those twenty years old or more, are to give an
offering to the Lord. The rich are not to give more than a half shekel and the
poor are not to give less when you make the offering to the Lord to atone for
your lives. Receive the atonement money from the Israelites and use it for the
service of the tent of meeting. It will be a memorial for the Israelites before
the Lord, making atonement for your lives.” – Exodus 30:11-16
I believe
this half-shekel requirement, which was a small amount, small enough for even
the poor to afford, was included in the Law because it forced everyone to
remember the Lord. I also think it foreshadowed Christ, but more on that later.
In any case, it appears from both our 2 Samuel and 2 Chronicles passages that
Joab remembered this law and the warning of plague that went with it, or at
least he remembered that the Israelites had always been told to be wary of
taking censuses without God giving a command through His prophets to do so.
Both
passages explain that indeed, a plague came on the people, an angel of death,
an angel of the Lord, struck down thousands of people. David, was in anguish
over this, and he then was visited by the prophet Gad. From 2 Samuel 24:
On that
day Gad went to David and said to him, “Go up and build an altar to the Lord on
the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite.” So David went up, as the Lord had
commanded through Gad. When Araunah looked and saw the king and his officials
coming toward him, he went out and bowed down before the king with his face to
the ground. Araunah said, “Why has my lord the king come to his servant?” “To
buy your threshing floor,” David answered, “so I can build an altar to the
Lord, that the plague on the people may be stopped.” – 2 Samuel 24:18-21
Notice that
Gad told David to “go up” to build this altar. We will come back to that later.
Araunah
said to David, “Let my lord the king take whatever he wishes and offer it up.
Here are oxen for the burnt offering, and here are threshing sledges and ox
yokes for the wood. Your Majesty, Araunah gives all this to the king.” Araunah
also said to him, “May the Lord your God accept you.” But the king replied to
Araunah, “No, I insist on paying you for it. I will not sacrifice to the Lord
my God burnt offerings that cost me nothing.” So David bought the threshing
floor and the oxen and paid fifty shekels of silver for them. David built an
altar to the Lord there and sacrificed burnt offerings and fellowship
offerings. Then the Lord answered his prayer in behalf of the land, and the
plague on Israel was stopped. – 2 Samuel 24:22-25
The
threshing floor is highly symbolic. A threshing floor was a place to separate
the grain from the chaff, the outer, inedible part of the plant (usually wheat
or barley). Threshing involved pulling a heavy sled (usually pulled by an
animal) over the gathered plants to crack the husks, breaking it off of the
edible grain. Now that the husks were broken off, the next step was to
physically separate the grain from the chaff, and this was done by using
winnowing forks to toss the combination of grain and chaff into the air. The
wind would carry away the lighter chaff, and the grain would fall back to the floor.
An ideal location for a threshing floor was on the top of a high hill, where
the wind would be strong enough to separate the grain from the chaff.
David also
needed to be separated from his sin. The sacrifice of the oxen (who were
innocent of David’s sin) paid the penalty for David. But even though David paid
for the oxen, it was really God who provided the way out of the situation
through the words of the prophet Gad. Note that, just as with Abraham, it was
God who told David where to go, where to erect his altar. And just as with
Abraham, the sacrificial animal was provided at this location.
The 2 Samuel
passage says that the Lord answered his prayer. The 1 Chronicles account gives
a little more detail:
David
built an altar to the Lord there and sacrificed burnt offerings and fellowship
offerings. He called on the Lord, and the Lord answered him with fire from
heaven on the altar of burnt offering. – 1 Chronicles 21:26
So David saw
personally the fire from heaven come down on this place.
We now come
to our third passage, our third person interacting with the Lord. This person
is Solomon. David had wanted to build a Temple for the Lord, but God said it
would be his son Solomon who would do it. 2 Chronicles 3:1 tells us where
Solomon would build the Temple, and this passage ties together everything we
have discussed so far:
Then
Solomon began to build the temple of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah,
where the Lord had appeared to his father David. It was on the threshing floor
of Araunah the Jebusite, the place provided by David. – 2 Chronicles 3:1
Why did God
have Abraham take a journey before having His test of sacrificing Isaac?
Because it foreshadowed what would happen on this very same spot. Solomon’s
Temple became the location where all the people of Israel would go to bring
sacrifices, substitutionary sacrifices for their sin. It was here that the
sacrifice of an innocent animal would be accepted as substitutionary payment
for their sin. And we know that after the Temple was dedicated by Solomon, the
glory of the Lord filled the Temple.
But despite
this, we know that the history of Israel, and the history of the kings of
Israel, was mostly generation after generation forgetting the Lord, choosing to
do things their own way, worshiping false gods, and doing many other things
that were detestable to the Lord. Finally, God’s judgment culminated in the
destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple:
On the
seventh day of the fifth month, in the nineteenth year of Nebuchadnezzar king
of Babylon, Nebuzaradan commander of the imperial guard, an official of the
king of Babylon, came to Jerusalem. He set fire to the temple of the Lord, the
royal palace and all the houses of Jerusalem. Every important building he
burned down. The whole Babylonian army under the commander of the imperial
guard broke down the walls around Jerusalem. Nebuzaradan the commander of the
guard carried into exile the people who remained in the city, along with the
rest of the populace and those who had deserted to the king of Babylon. But the
commander left behind some of the poorest people of the land to work the
vineyards and fields. – 2 Kings 25:8-12
The
Babylonians broke up the bronze pillars, the movable stands and the bronze sea
that were at the temple of the Lord and they carried the bronze to Babylon.
They also took away the pots, shovels, wick trimmers, dishes and all the bronze
articles used in the temple service. The commander of the imperial guard took
away the censers and sprinkling bowls—all that were made of pure gold or
silver. – 2 Kings 25:13-15
Seventy
years later, the Temple was rebuilt by Zerubbabel in the age of the Persians.
King Darius discovered a scroll of King Cyrus, and he heeded what it said,
which includes the following:
Let the Temple
be rebuilt as a place to present sacrifices, and let its foundations be laid.
It is to be sixty cubits high and sixty cubits wide, with three courses of
large stones and one of timbers. The costs are to be paid by the royal
treasury. Also, the gold and silver articles of the house of God, which
Nebuchadnezzar took from the temple in Jerusalem and brought to Babylon, are to
be returned to their places in the Temple in Jerusalem; they are to be
deposited in the house of God. Now then, Tattenai, governor of Trans-Euphrates,
and Shethar-Bozenai and you other officials of that province, stay away from
there. Do not interfere with the work on this Temple of God. Let the governor
of the Jews and the Jewish elders rebuild this house of God on its site. – Ezra
6:3b-7
And so
remarkably, miraculously, the Temple was rebuilt, at the same site as the
previous Temple, on Moriah. As you can see, layer upon layer of activity is
accumulating at this location.
Shortly
before the time of Jesus, Herod the Great was king of Judea under Augustus
Caesar. Herod was someone who was Jewish, and wished to be loved by the Jews,
but the Jews were wary of him because of his ties to the Romans. Herod is most
famous for his building projects (one of which we spoke about previously in
this series), but undoubtedly his greatest work was to enhance the Temple
location. Here is what the contemporary historian Josephus writes:
In
the eighteenth year of his reign, Herod started to enlarge and reconstruct the
temple at his own expense, which he knew would be his greatest enterprise… The
temple itself was built by the priests in a year-and-a-half and was dedicated
in a great celebration.
Herod was
immensely proud of his achievement, but Jesus prophesied its destruction in
Matthew 24:
Jesus
left the temple and was walking away when His disciples came up to Him to call
His attention to its buildings. “Do you see all these things?” He asked. “Truly
I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be
thrown down.” – Matthew 24:1-2
It is
important to read this prophecy carefully. Jesus is speaking of the buildings
on top of the Temple Mount, not the Temple Mount itself. And the prophecy came
true in AD 70. The Roman emperor Vespasian ordered that it be destroyed, and
his son Titus oversaw the terrible work. Josephus writes:
Around
the altar were heaps of corpses, while streams of blood flowed down the steps
of the sanctuary… The Romans pitched their standards (images of their false
gods) inside the temple court and offered sacrifice… Caesar ordered the entire
city and temple smashed to the ground.
And indeed,
this is what happened. Jesus’ prophecy came true. The Jewish Temple was
completely destroyed. The stones were thrown down off the Temple Mount
platform.
In AD 130,
the Roman emperor Hadrian made plans to build an entire city where Jerusalem
had stood, including a temple to Jupiter at the site of the Temple Mount. This
led to a major Jewish revolt called the Bar Kokhba revolution, but the Jews
were unsuccessful, and most were forcefully depopulated from the region
afterwards. Due to the delays of the revolt, however, Hadrian’s city was not
built, and instead a small shrine was built on the Temple Mount including a
statue of Hadrian and an idol of Jupiter. This shrine was still there in the
fourth century AD, when one of the church fathers, Jerome, visited the site and
wrote about what he saw.
Some time
when Christianity spread from the third to the seventh century, the period
known as the Byzantine era, Hadrian’s shrine was completely removed, so as to
restore the “sanctity” of the site. We know this from written accounts of the
time describing the Temple Mount as completely barren.
In AD 638,
the Muslim Caliph Omar captured Jerusalem. He was shown the Temple Mount, and
we have this account of the defeated Byzantine bishop of Jerusalem speaking to
Omar, who wanted a place to build a sanctuary. The patriarch said to him:
It
is the rock… It is in the center of the world and was a Temple for the
Israelites, who held it in great veneration and wherever they were, they turned
their faces toward it during prayer.” [We], however,… did not build a church
over it because Christ our Lord said in His Holy Gospel, ‘Not a stone will be
left upon a stone which will not be ruined and devastated.’ For this reason,
[we] left it as a ruin and did not build a church over it.
And so we
learn why no church was built over the site in the Byzantine era. Omar had the
rubble cleared, but a later Caliph named Abd al-Malkik was the one built the
Dome of the Rock, which was finished in AD 692.
So let’s
talk about the archaeological evidence we have and look at some pictures. First
note that it is not possible to directly excavate Mount Moriah, because to do
so would be to literally start World War III. As we go into this, I think it is
easy to be somewhat jaded about what we have, because this location is one of
the most well-known locations in the world. This is not a surprise like
Joshua’s altar from last week. But don’t let this location’s familiarity take
away from the fact that it provides powerful evidence of the truth of the
Bible. We will start with the most recent constructions and work our way back
in time.
The first
images show both a topographical map of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, and the
second image is a drawing from the 1930s of what was (and is) on the Temple
Mount. Our next image shows the entire Temple Mount complex.
The next picture
illustrates the Dome of the Rock. The Dome of the Rock has been remodeled over
and over, but it still marks the spot, marks Moriah, with certainty. Along with
the Al-Aqsa Mosque, these are the major Islamic-era constructions on the site.
Although we
have no remaining physical evidence of Hadrian’s shrine, we do have evidence of
an arch (not shown) built by Hadrian to support a road which led up to
Hadrian’s shrine on the Temple Mount.
As for the
Roman destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70, the next image shows that as evidence
we have many huge boulders from the top of the Temple Mount pushed over the
outer walls of the Mount that have landed and broken up below.
The next
image shows that Western Wall, a section of Herod’s outer wall structure that
has been fully exposed to reveal the actual wall that Herod made. (A lot of the
other walls are covered up in whole or in part by later constructions, even
medieval residences.) Jews consider the Western Wall Judaism’s holiest site, as
it is the wall closest to where the Holy of Holies in the Temple was located.
Is there remaining physical evidence of Zerubbabel’s temple? Yes. The next image shows a
seam on the east-facing wall of the Temple Mount. One of the excavators of this
site says this:
The
surviving masonry, to the right of the straight joint, is likely to be in
origin that of Zerubbabel, though an analysis of the courses visible suggests
that there may be about three styles possibly representing rebuilds during the
stormy life of Zerubbabel’s Temple.
You can see
several styles of stone in the image, all clearly different from the Herodian
style.
Now, to find
evidence of the Babylonian burn and destruction, we would have to dig in the
Temple Mount. But the Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem, not just the Mount, and
there is plenty of archaeological evidence for this. Consider this quote from
an excavator:
The
massive destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians is apparent not only in the
thick layers of charred remains unearthed in structures such as the Burnt Room
and the Bullae House, but also in the deep stone rubble from collapsed
buildings found covering the eastern slope.
The Burnt
Room excavation site is shown in the next picture. Regarding this site, I found
the following quote:
The
fire that consumed Jerusalem in 586 BCE did not spare the Royal Quarter. Among
the ruins was the burnt room of a house that had collapsed in the fire; its
floor was covered with a thick layer of ash. Under the piles of debris in the
burnt room, the excavators found numerous arrowheads and the remains of a
charred wooden piece of furniture carved with a stylized date-palm motif. The
furniture, made of wood imported from Syria, is another sign of the elevated
status of the inhabitants.
We also have
a section of wall just uncovered in 2021 of a section that did not burn. The
next image shows this site. From the Jerusalem Post:
The
massive structure – some 5 m. wide – was built on the steep eastern slope
leading to the city, just a few dozen meters away from the Temple Mount. Probably
the steepness of the area preserved the structure from destruction during the
Babylonian conquest – a vivid account of which is offered in the Bible – since
the invading army likely accessed the city from an easier path.
What about
Solomon’s constructions? Again, we cannot dig around at the site of Solomon’s
Temple, but from I Kings 9:15, we know he built a palace, terraces, and a “wall
of Jerusalem,” among other places. We have found a portion of what are almost
certainly Solomon’s walls just south of the Temple Mount. Here is what one of
the archaeologists working on the site says:
In
the process of excavating through the later layers… we not only discovered
well-preserved First Temple period walls, but also intact floor layers with
in-situ pottery vessels… Dating the construction of the fortification line to
sometime in the second half of the 10th century [BC] makes King
Solomon out to be the best candidate for its architect.
Although we
don’t have evidence for David’s altar on the threshing floor or Abraham’s much
earlier altar where he was ready to sacrifice Isaac, we do have abundant
evidence about David’s life including archaeological sites, which we will
discuss later. And we have already discussed Mamre, which validates Abraham.
I want to
finish today by talking about the significance of the fact that God choose
Moriah as a location for Abraham and Isaac, for David’s altar on the threshing
floor, for Solomon’s Temple, and for the rebuilt Temple. And for this I want to
go to an inscription on the Dome of the Rock, dating all the way back to the
original construction in AD 692. The inscription is a dedication, and it quotes
a verse from the Koran:
So
believe in God and all the messengers and stop talking about a Trinity…. Say
only the truth about Jesus over whom you dispute: he is the son of Mary! It is
not fitting that God should beget a father or son.
Think about
the fact that this quote sits at the site of the Temple. This quote is saying
to Jesus, “You are not the son of God!” We have heard this before. Satan
himself tempted Jesus in the desert, three times saying “If you are the
son of God.” Satan knew exactly who Jesus was, but he was foolish to think that
he could actually defeat Jesus through temptation. But today, he is not so
foolish. He wants everyone to think that Jesus was not the son of God, and he
even has an inscription over the very site where he once tempted Jesus.
It has
struck me that, other than Abraham and David, each builder on Moriah has not
done well when it comes to faith. (Zerubbabel, the rebuilder, is an exception.)
Solomon pretty completely fell away from faith later in life. Herod showed no
signs of faith, and built his giant construction projects so that the Jews
would like him. (He is the same Herod that killed the baby boys in Bethlehem as
an attempt to kill the real king of the Jews.) And Hadrian, likewise,
wanted to use the site to glorify himself (and build an idol to his pagan god).
And finally, the inscription on the Dome of the Rock makes it clear what the
real purpose of the Dome was – to deny the identity of Jesus, to whom, one day,
every knee will bow.
But most
importantly, Jesus was the fulfillment of the events on Moriah involving
Abraham and David. Remember what Abraham named this place: “On this mountain
the Lord will provide.” And He did provide. He provided Jesus, His only
Son, whom He loves. By providing a substitution for Isaac, God enabled the
promised blessing on all peoples and nations to happen, and that blessing was
Jesus, because by believing in Him, we have eternal life. As for David, he
learned that the sacrifice on that mountain was necessary to save the people
from receiving the just punishment for their sins. David sacrificed an innocent
animal on that winnowing floor, and that animal took the place of all the
people. This was a foreshadowing of Jesus, the Lamb of God, who takes away the
sins of the world. And a winnowing is coming, and those who have trusted in
Christ for their salvation will be like the wheat, but those who have rejected
Him will be like the chaff. Do you remember what the centurion exclaimed when
he saw how Jesus died?
And when
the centurion, who stood there in front of Jesus, saw how He died, he said,
“Surely this man was the Son of God!” – Mark 15:39
The verse
right before this verse tells us that when Jesus died, the curtain of the Temple,
the curtain that kept everyone out of the Holy of Holies, right there on
Moriah, the super-tall, thick, untearable curtain, tore cleanly in two from
the top to the bottom, as if God Himself reached down and tore it (which is
what I think happened). And at that moment, that centurion, and everyone else
who has believed, was no longer separated from God by their sin.
Therefore,
brothers and sisters, since we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by
the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain,
that is, His body, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let
us draw near to God with a sincere heart and with the full assurance that faith
brings, having our hearts sprinkled to cleanse us from a guilty conscience and
having our bodies washed with pure water. Let us hold unswervingly to the hope
we profess, for He who promised is faithful. – Hebrews. 10:19-23
No comments:
Post a Comment