Welcome! Today we continue our series
entitled Mine, in which we explore
the Biblical standards of ownership, stewardship, and lordship. Today’s message
focuses on rights.
Although the concept of “rights” is muted
in some cultures around the world, here in America, it is huge. You could
almost say it is in our DNA – it is in our Declaration of Independence, almost
from the very beginning:
“When in the
Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the
political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the
powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature
and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind
requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the
separation.”
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
“Unalienable” rights means that no one has the right to take away your rights. The document even says that the primary purpose of a government is to secure your rights. The word “right” occurs 10 times in this short document. Built into the foundational US documents is the idea that government doesn’t get to just give you a short list of rights it magnanimously lets you have; instead, the government’s powers are quite limited, and unless in a particular area its powers are listed out explicitly, that right falls back on state and local governments, whose power is similarly limited so that unmentioned rights reside with the people. In a fallen world filled with plentiful examples of governments rising in power until they become oppressive and almost no examples of the opposite, I think this is a wise way to define a government. When Christ returns, people like to say it will be quite different, and that may be so, but ultimately, in heaven, we will be so changed that we will be governed from within as much as from outside ourselves. As Ireland and other smaller governments learned in times of widespread revival, you don’t need much government when the people follow Christ.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
“Unalienable” rights means that no one has the right to take away your rights. The document even says that the primary purpose of a government is to secure your rights. The word “right” occurs 10 times in this short document. Built into the foundational US documents is the idea that government doesn’t get to just give you a short list of rights it magnanimously lets you have; instead, the government’s powers are quite limited, and unless in a particular area its powers are listed out explicitly, that right falls back on state and local governments, whose power is similarly limited so that unmentioned rights reside with the people. In a fallen world filled with plentiful examples of governments rising in power until they become oppressive and almost no examples of the opposite, I think this is a wise way to define a government. When Christ returns, people like to say it will be quite different, and that may be so, but ultimately, in heaven, we will be so changed that we will be governed from within as much as from outside ourselves. As Ireland and other smaller governments learned in times of widespread revival, you don’t need much government when the people follow Christ.
Now it sadly
ironic that many people lean on the Declaration of Independence to say that
Christians are wrong for trying to impose their morality on everyone else. Why
is this ironic? Because the Declaration says that the reason governments must
not usurp these rights is because they are endowed by our Creator! You should
not defend your behavior with an argument you completely reject! Often when
Christians are accused of this, it is in an area in which the person’s decisions
adversely affect other people; in other words, exercising their “right” actually takes away someone else’s right. There is probably no example where this is
clearer than in the area of abortion, where choosing to exercise your “right to
choose” takes away the very life of someone who has no choice.
And the people
who think this way completely misunderstand what God is like. Jesus Himself
said,
I have
come that they may have life, and have it to the full. – John 10:10b
I like how it is translated in the King
James:
I am
come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. –
John 10:10b
The Greek word translated “to the full” and
“more abundantly” is perisso, and its
meanings include “over and above, more than is necessary, super-added,
exceedingly abundantly, supremely, superior, extraordinary, surpassing,
uncommon.” It describes a happy life,
one with joy, blessing, overflowing with goodness. So there is your “life” and “pursuit of
happiness.”
As for “liberty,” I think of what Jesus said about freedom in John 8:
To the Jews who had
believed Him, Jesus said, “If you hold to My teaching, you are really My
disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” They
answered Him, “We are Abraham’s descendants and have never been slaves of
anyone. How can You say that we shall be set free?” Jesus replied, “Very truly
I tell you, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. Now a slave has no permanent
place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever. So if the Son sets you
free, you will be free indeed. – John 8:31-36
Christianity is not about restricting other
people’s fun, but about setting people free from bondage to their sin and to
the consequences of their sin. It is about liberty. This theme repeats itself
again and again in Scripture:
But
whoever looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues
in it—not forgetting what they have heard, but doing it—they will be blessed in
what they do. – James 1:25
Now
the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.
– 2 Cor. 3:17
And let me quote the first parts of several
verses; I will give the remainder of these verses later,
but for now just look at the first parts:
Live
as free people… - I Peter 2:16a
You,
my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. – Gal. 5:13a
So, yes, as far as it goes, there is at
least a sense in which we have been endowed by our Creator with certain
inalienable rights, and that, as far as it goes, among these are life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness.
Now I keep saying “as far as it goes”
because our Creator gives us the life He gives us; if we have put our faith and
trust in Him, receiving Him as our Savior and Lord, we do have an unimaginable
eternity with Him ahead of us, but in this short life on Earth, we don’t have rights about exactly what our
lives will be like.
Sometimes we are flat-out wrong about what
we think are our rights. We may not come out and say it, but we think we have
rights to an easy life, to a life free of suffering and pain. This weekend I
have suffered with a horrible toothache; my idea of the “pursuit of happiness”
does not include going through this toothache. We don’t have a right to
universal supernatural health care. We don’t have a right to a top-quality education.
We don’t have a right to find Mr. or Mrs. Right and have a great marriage. We
don’t have a right to 2.5 perfectly behaved and constantly overachieving kids
who grow up to be strong believers, happy, and successful. We don’t have a
right to the perfect, easy, high-paying job. We don’t even have any rights as
to how long we live in this world.
This kind of thinking, although not often
stated outright, is so common in America. Sometimes instead of speaking of
“rights” we talk of what we “deserve.” This is almost worse to my ears. We
deserve better service. We deserve a nice house. We deserve lots of “me” time.
Why do we “deserve” these things? Because
we are so good? Because other people have them and we don’t, and that’s not
fair?
If you look up the word “deserve” in a
concordance, pretty much all you find are verses that talk about the punishment
people deserve for their sins. One apparent exception is the following:
When
Jesus had finished saying all this to the people who were listening, he entered
Capernaum. There
a centurion’s servant, whom his master valued highly, was sick and about to
die. The centurion heard of Jesus and sent some elders
of the Jews to him, asking him to come and heal his servant. When they came to Jesus, they pleaded earnestly with Him, “This man
deserves to have you do this, because he loves our
nation and has built our synagogue.” So Jesus went with
them. – Luke 7:1-6a
Now, this is surprising, isn’t it? Did
Jesus just agree that this man deserves His help? Well, the story doesn’t end
here – let’s go on a bit further:
He
was not far from the house when the centurion sent friends to say to him:
“Lord, don’t trouble yourself, for I do not deserve to have you come under my
roof. That is why I did not even consider myself worthy to come
to you. But say the word, and my servant will be healed. – Luke 7:6b-7
Jesus did go on to heal the servant, not
because the centurion “deserved” it, but because of “his great faith.” It is
the kindness and mercy of God that we don’t
get what we deserve.
Let me just go on to say briefly that the
people who constantly do talk about their “rights” and what they “deserve” are
really hard to be around. Thinking this way only brings out one’s selfishness.
It also brings out bitterness as you don’t get what you think you deserve, and
the ultimate fruit of this is isolation and loneliness. Thinking this way is
just one of many ways that pride expresses itself, and is the opposite of
humility, and it is humility, not pride, that tends to attract friends.
I think we have covered some important
ideas and concepts. But if we stop here, I think we are ignoring one of the
most important messages of Scripture: that just
because you have a right doesn’t mean that you have to use it. In fact, the
very life of Christ, from giving up His glory to come as a baby, to being born
in a stable, to living a human life not as a king but as basically a nobody, to
fasting for 40 days in the dessert and being tempted by Satan to procure bread,
to going on the road building into a small group of ragtag disciples who don’t
understand or appreciate Him, to repeatedly being accused and threatened and
ridiculed by Jewish teachers and leaders who by all “rights” should have bowed
before Him, the King of kings and Lord of lords, to allowing Himself to go
through thoroughly corrupt trials, to be savagely beaten, spit upon, mocked,
and finally hung on a cross like one of the worst criminals – all of this, was
it not the ultimate example for all time of choosing not to exercise one’s rights?
What did Jesus first say to His disciples?
“Follow Me.” We too are invited to voluntarily give up our “rights” to be His
servants, or “slaves.” This principle of voluntary servitude goes all the way
back to Exodus. When a Hebrew “sold himself” into what was basically indentured
servitude, there was a rule that he had to be released after 6 years. But he
had an option to continue to serve if he wished. Here is the passage:
“But if the servant
declares, ‘I love my master and my wife and children and do not want to go
free,’ then
his master must take him before the judges. He shall take him to the door or
the doorpost and pierce his ear with an awl. Then he will be his servant for
life.” – Ex. 21:5-6
We can do something similar. Here is what
Jesus said:
Then
he called the crowd to Him along with his disciples and said: “Whoever wants to be My
disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow Me. – Mark
8:35
To deny yourself is to forget about your
“rights,” to let it go. To take up your cross is to willingly suffer things you
do not have to suffer. I think of Jesus’ example of washing His disciples’ feet
as another example of voluntary servitude, of not even giving a passing thought
to your “rights.”
The heart of the gospel involves Jesus
taking the form of a servant and laying His life down for us. And we see this
also lived out in His disciples, especially in Paul. I want to focus on some things
Paul says in I Corinthians, because it provides a powerful contrast between
those who focus on their “rights” (the Corinthians) and those who lay them down
(Paul).
Corinth was a city with a reputation for
evil and immorality, so much so that to call someone a Corinthian was a common
insult. According to Acts 18, the church in Corinth was started by Paul on his
second missionary journey. There, he met a Jewish person named Aquila and his
wife Priscilla. As Paul began sharing the gospel in the Jewish synagogue, he
lived with Aquila and Priscilla and supported himself by making tents (as they
also did). Silas and Timothy soon joined Paul, but the Jews as a whole refused
to hear the gospel (an important exception was Crispus, the ruler of the
synagogue). Paul then began preaching to the Gentiles. After a year and a half,
a Roman proconsul named Gallio came to town, and the Jews used the opportunity
to bring charges against Paul. Gallio refused to hear the charges because they
had to do with matters of the Jewish religion, not a Roman concern. Despite
opposition, Paul continued to share the gospel in Corinth for some time before
eventually leaving. One reason Paul spent so much time there was that Corinth
was a huge city with a population of 600,000, so each new day was another
opportunity to share the gospel with new people as well as build up those who
had become believers.
Anyway, sometime later, Paul learned from
the household of Chloe and three other members of the church that the church in
Corinth was having multiple problems. The church itself also asked some
questions in a letter to Paul on issues related to some of these problems (but
probably not all of them). Previously, Paul had written a letter to them and
also had sent Timothy to help with their problems, so the “new” news Paul was
receiving was basically showing that things were still bad there.
What were the problems? Here are some of
them. Some members of the church denied the resurrection.The church was badly
divided, with subgroups that followed their favorite preachers. There was a man
in the church actively living immorally, doing so openly, and the church was
doing nothing about it. There were members of the church who were taking other
believers to the public courts rather than trying to work things out alone or
with the help of the local Christian leaders. There were disputes within the
church over such issues as whether it was wrong to eat meat that had been
offered to idols. There were apparently questions about circumcision. There
were questions about marriage and apparently problems with divorce and
separation, with some wanting to leave simply because there were conflicts in
the marriage. Some women were abusing their freedom in Christ by refusing to
submit to their husbands. The Lord’s Supper (taking a meal to remember Christ
together, also remembering Christ with the bread and the cup) had become a mere
common meal with people taking food selfishly, taking advantage of the free
meal. There were major disputes about how to run their meetings, with
contention and confusion about the role and place and expression of spiritual
gifts in the meetings. If this is not a perfect picture of a group of people
obsessed with their individual “rights” and what they each “deserve,” I don’t
know what is!
And because Paul was getting involved in
trying to improve this mess, some barbs and attacks were directed at him, for
example questioning whether he was really an apostle, whether he had any
business interfering with their dysfunctional church. Now listen to what Paul
has to say in Chapter 9 of I Corinthians, and contrast it to the behavior of
the Corinthian church:
Am I
not free? Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not the
result of my work in the Lord?
Even though I may not be an apostle to others, surely I am to
you! For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord. This is my defense to
those who sit in judgment on me. Don’t we have the
right to food and drink? Don’t we have the right to
take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord’s
brothers and Cephas? Or is it only I and Barnabas who
lack the right to not work for a living? – I Cor. 9:1-6
Do you catch the discussion about rights?
Paul is saying, convincingly, that he and Barnabas had a valid right to partake
of their food, to be married, and to work.
Who serves as a
soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard and does not eat its grapes?
Who tends a flock and does not drink the milk? Do I say this merely on human authority? Doesn’t the
Law say the same thing? For it is written in the Law of
Moses: “Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain.” Is it about
oxen that God is concerned? Surely he says this for us,
doesn’t he? Yes, this was written for us, because whoever plows and threshes
should be able to do so in the hope of sharing in the harvest. If we have sown spiritual seed among you, is it too much if we reap
a material harvest from you? If others have this right
of support from you, shouldn’t we have it all the more? – I Cor. 9:7-12a
Again, there’s that word “right” again. Paul, again
convincingly, argues that he and Barnabas also have a right to be paid for
their work with the Corinthian church. But there’s a “but” coming!
But we did not use
this right. On the contrary, we put up with anything rather than hinder the
gospel of Christ. Don’t you know that those who serve in the temple get their
food from the temple, and that those who serve at the altar share in what is
offered on the altar? In the same way, the Lord has commanded that those who preach the
gospel should receive their living from the gospel. But I have not used any of
these rights. And I am not writing this in the hope that you will do such
things for me, for I would rather die than allow anyone to deprive me of this
boast. – I Cor. 9:12b-15
What a contrast! The Corinthians who are acting selfishly and claiming all
sorts of “rights” that don’t exist on one hand, and Paul, who has a genuine
right to support and much more but does not take a penny (or a mite), on the
other.
For when I preach the
gospel, I cannot boast, since I am compelled to preach. Woe to me if I do not
preach the gospel! If I preach voluntarily, I have a reward; if not
voluntarily, I am simply discharging the trust committed to me. What then is my reward? Just this: that in preaching the gospel I
may offer it free of charge, and so not make full use of my rights as a
preacher of the gospel. – I Cor. 9:16-18
Though I am free and
belong to no one, I have made myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as
possible. To
the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became
like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win
those under the law. To those not having the law I
became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am
under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law. To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things
to all people so that by all possible means I might save some. I do all this for the sake of the gospel that I may share in its
blessings. – I Cor. 9:19-23
These last 5 verses are frequently used out
of context – people make the focus of the verses on how Paul puts on different
hats, so to speak, as he shares the gospel with other people. Paul is indeed
doing this, but the context here is about laying down rights for the sake of
the gospel. Paul makes himself a slave to everyone to win as many as possible.
That word “slave”, doulos, is a very
strong, shocking word to come from someone who has just laid out his rights as
an Apostle; it is very similar to the shock the disciples felt when Jesus
washed their feet.
Paul is laying aside his preferences, his
personal opinions, all of this – so that the gospel would not be impeded. He
serves the unlovely, those with rough edges, those without his education,
anyone, if they will allow Paul to tell them about the risen Christ. And his
focus is on the gospel, not on what he wants.
To Paul, rights are things we voluntarily
lay down if we want to be more like Christ, if we want to be about His work.
I would encourage you to look at the
relationships around you – those with believers and those with unbelievers, and
ask the questions, “Am I laying down my life, my rights, for Christ?” “Are my
heart and actions focused on sharing the gospel with unbelievers of all
stripes?” Again, Christ doesn’t force us to do these things – we have freedom
in Him. But let us use this freedom to, as He told the first disciples, really
“follow Him.”
To
finish the passages I started earlier:
Live
as free people but do not use your freedom as a cover-up for evil; live as
God’s slaves. - I Peter 2:16
You,
my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to
indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love. – Gal. 5:13
No comments:
Post a Comment