Revelation 15:1-16:21
Some people see the book of Revelation as a fictitious
story. Some see it as true prophecy but
they see every element as figurative, and none of it as literal. Others see every element as literal and none
of it as figurative. Some people see it
as a hoax. “After all,” they say, “it
was a book written by men nearly 2000 years ago. Men make errors, therefore, this book is only
full of errors. Countless additions and
subtractions in this book have shown that it’s not a reliable source at
all.” How are we supposed to read
Revelation? As a myth? As only figurative? As only literal? As a hoax?
We’re about to read some of the most
disturbing images found in the Bible.
Will these things really happen?
Are they literal or just figurative?
Before I answer these questions let
me ask you a few questions to think about.
If you read a book that predicted the future accurately how would it
change your view of it? Do you think it
would be possible that an all knowing, intelligent being who is not bound by
time, is possibly behind that book? At
this point, I’m not asking if you believe in Revelation or if you believe in
God. But do you think it’s possible that
an all knowing, intelligent being who is not bound by time could be the
ultimate author behind the Bible?